Fertility and Sterility
Volume 93, Issue 2 , Pages 490-498 , 15 January 2010

Practice patterns and outcomes with the use of single embryo transfer in the United States

Presented at the 64th annual meeting of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, San Francisco, California, November 8–12, 2008.

  • Barbara Luke, Sc.D., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology and Department of Epidemiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Barbara Luke, Sc.D., M.P.H., Dept. OB/GYN & Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, B227 West Fee Hall, East Lansing, Michigan 48824 (FAX: 517-353-1663).
    • ,
  • Morton B. Brown, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
    • ,
  • David A. Grainger, M.D., M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Center for Reproductive Medicine and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita, Kansas
    • ,
  • Marcelle Cedars, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of California, San Francisco, California
    • ,
  • Nancy Klein, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Seattle Reproductive Medicine, Seattle, Washington
    • ,
  • Judy E. Stern, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
    • ,
  • Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Writing Group

Received 23 November 2008 ,Revised 13 February 2009 ,Accepted 25 February 2009.

References 

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Reproductive Technology. 2005 assisted reproductive technology success rates: national summary and fertility clinic reports. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2007;
  2. Reynolds MA, Schieve LA, Martin JA, Jeng G, Macaluso M. Trends in multiple births conceived using assisted reproductive technology, United States, 1997–2000. Pediatrics. 2003;111:1159–1162
  3. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S, et al. Births: final data for 2005. National vital statistics reports, vol. 56, no. 6. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2007;
  4. Bouvier-Colle MH, Varnoux N, Salanave B, Ancel P-Y, Bréart G. Case-control study of risk factors for obstetric patients' admission to intensive care units. Eur J Obstet Gynecol and Reproductive Biology. 1997;74:173–177
  5. Conde-Agudelo A, Belizàn JM, Lindmark G. Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with multiple gestations. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:899–904
  6. Senat MV, Ancel PY, Bouvier-Colle MH, Breart G. How does multiple pregnancy affect maternal mortality and morbidity?. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1998;41:78–83
  7. Mackay AP, Berg CJ, King JC, Duran C, Chang J. Pregnancy-related mortality among women with multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:563–568
  8. Donovan EF, Ehrenkranz RA, Shankaran S, Stevenson DK, Wright LL, Younes N, et al. Outcomes of very low birth weight twins cared for in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network's intensive care units. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:742–749
  9. Stevenson DK, Wright LL, Lemons JA, Oh W, Korones SB, Papile L-A, et al. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, January 1993 through December 1994. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:1632–1639
  10. Martin JA, MacDorman MF, Mathews TJ. Triplet births: trends and outcomes, 1971–94. National Center for Health Statistics vital and health statistics, vol. 21, no. 55. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1997;
  11. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Mencker F, Park MM, Sutton PD. Births: final data for 2001. National vital statistics reports; vol. 51, no. 2. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2002;
  12. Russell RB, Petrini JR, Damus K, Mattison DR, Schwarz RH. The changing epidemiology of multiple births in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:129–135
  13. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S. Births: final data for 2004. National vital statistics reports, vol. 55, no. 1. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2006;
  14. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Practice Committee opinion. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Birmingham, AL: American Society for Assisted Reproductive Medicine; January 1998;
  15. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Practice Committee opinion. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Birmingham, AL: American Society for Assisted Reproductive Medicine; November 1999;
  16. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines on the number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:773–774
  17. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines on the number of embryos transferred. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:S51–S52
  18. Stern JE, Cedars MI, Jain T, Klein NA, Beaird CM, Grainger DA, et al. Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:275–282
  19. Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Lancaster P, Nygren K-G, Sullivan E, Zegers-Hochschild F International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART). World collaborative report on in vitro fertilization, 2000. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:1586–1622
  20. Andersen AN, Goossens V, Ferraretti AP, Bhattacharya S, Felberbaum R, de Mouzon J, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2004: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:756–771
  21. Reynolds MA, Schieve LA, Jeng G, Peterson HB. Does insurance coverage decrease the risk for multiple births associated with assisted reproductive technology?. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:16–23
  22. Gibbons W, Grainger D, Cedars M, Jain T, Klein N, Stern J. Continuous quality improvement and assisted reproductive technology multiple gestations: Some progress, some answers, more questions. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:301–304
  23. Henne MB, Bundorf MK. Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:66–73
  24. Pinborg A, Loft A, Schmidt L, Andersen AN. Attitudes of IVF/ICSI-twin mothers toward twins and single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:621–627
  25. Ryan GL, Zhang SH, Dokras A, Syrop CH, Van Voorhis BJ. The desire of infertile patients for multiple births. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:500–504
  26. Hojgaard A, Ottosen LD, Kesmodel U, Ingerslev HJ. Patient attitudes toward twin pregnancies and single embryo transfer—a questionnaire study. Hum Reprod. 2008;22:2673–2678
  27. Elster N Institute for Science, Law, and Technology Working Group on Reproductive Technology. Less is more: the risks of multiple births. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:617–623
  28. Bryan E. The impact of multiple preterm births on the family. BJOG. 2003;110:24–28
  29. D'Alton M. Infertility and the desire for multiple births. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:523–525
  30. Ellison MA, Hall JE. Social stigma and compounded losses: quality-of-life issues for multiple-birth families. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:405–414
  31. ESHRE Campus Report. Prevention of twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI by single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:790–800
  32. Pinborg A. IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11:575–593
  33. Nakhuda GS, Sauer MV. Addressing the growing problem of multiple gestations created by assisted reproductive therapies. Sem Perinatol. 2005;29:355–362
  34. Söderström-Anttila V, Vilska S. Five years of single embryo transfer with anonymous and nonanonymous oocyte donation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;15:428–433
  35. Gerris J, De Neubourg D, Mangelschots K, Van Royen E, Vercruyssen M, Barudy-Vasquez J, et al. Elective single day 3 embryo transfer halves the twinning rate without decrease in the ongoing pregnancy rate of an IVF/ICSI programme. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2626–2631
  36. Twisk M, van der Veen F, Repping S, Heineman MJ, Korevaar JC, Bossuyt PM. Preferences of subfertile women regarding elective single embryo transfer: additional in vitro fertilization cycles are acceptable, lower pregnancy rates are not. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:1006–1009
  37. van Montfoort AP, Fiddelers AA, Janssen JM, Derhaag JG, Dirksen CD, Dunselman GA, et al. In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared to double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:338–343
  38. van Montfoort AP, Fiddelers AA, Land JA, Dirksen CD, Severens JL, Geraedts JP, et al. eSET irrespective of the availability of a good-quality embryo in the first cycle only is not effective in reducing overall twin pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1669–1674
  39. Vilska S, Tiitinen A, Hydén-Granskog C, Hovatta O. Elective transfer of one embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple birth. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2392–2395
  40. Martikainen H, Tiitinen A, Tomás C, Tapanainen J, Orava M, Tuomivaara L, et al. Finnish ET Study Group One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1900–1903
  41. Gardner DK, Surrey E, Minjarez D, Leitz A, Stevens J, Schoolcraft WB. Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:551–555
  42. Thurin A, Hausken J, Hillensjö T, Jablonowska B, Pinborg A, Strandell A, et al. Elective single-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2392–2402
  43. Criniti A, Thyer A, Chow G, Lin P, Klein N, Soules M. Elective single blastocyst transfer reduces twin rates without compromising pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1613–1619
  44. van Monfoort AP, Dumoulin JC, Land JA, Coonen E, Derhaag JG, Evers JL. Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) in the first three IVF/ICSI treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:433–436
  45. Veleva Z, Vilska S, Hydén-Granskog C, Tiitinen A, Tapanainen JS, Martikainen H. Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36–39 years. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2098–2102
  46. Ryan GL, Sparks AE, Sipe CS, Syrop CH, Dokras A, Van Voorhis BJ. A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a United States IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:354–360
  47. Styer AK, Wright DL, Wolkovich AM, Veiga C, Toth TL. Single-blastocyst transfer decreases twin gestation without affecting pregnancy outcome. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1702–1708
  48. Khalaf Y, El-Toukhy T, Coomarasamy A, Kamal A, Bolton V, Braude P. Selective single blastocyst transfer reduces the multiple pregnancy rate and increases pregnancy rates: A pre- and postintervention study. BJOG. 2008;115:385–390
  49. Gardner DK, Sakkas D. Assessment of embryo viability: the ability to select a single embryo for transfer—a review. Placenta. 2003;24(Suppl B):S5–S12
  50. Gardner DK, Lane M. Toward a single embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;6:470–481
  51. Katz-Jaffe MG, Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. Proteomic analysis of individual human embryos to identify novel biomarkers of development and viability. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:101–107
  52. Urbanski JP, Johnson MT, Craig DD, Potter DL, Gardner DK, Thorsen T. Noninvasive metabolic profiling using microfluidics for analysis of single Preimplantation embryos. Anal Chem. 2008;80:6500–6507
  53. van Montfoort AP, Geraedts JP, Dumoulin JC, Stassen AP, Evers JL, Ayoubi TA. Differential gene expression in cumulus cells as a prognostic indicator of embryo viability: a microarray analysis. Mol Hum Reprod. 2008;14:157–168
  54. Gleicher N, Barad D. The relative myth of elective single embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:1337–1344
  55. Luke B, Brown MB. Contemporary risks of maternal morbidity and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal age and plurality. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:283–293
  56. Luke B, Brown MB, Alexandre PK, Kinoshi T, O'Sullivan MJ, Martin D, et al. The cost of twin pregnancy: maternal and neonatal factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:909–915
  57. Collins J. Cost-effectiveness of in vitro fertilization. Semin Reprod Med. 2001;19:279–289
  58. Chambers GM, Chapman MG, Grayson N, Shanahan M, Sullivan EA. Babies born after ART treatment cost more than nonART babies: a cost analysis of inpatient birth-admission costs of singleton and multiple gestation pregnancies. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:3108–3115
  59. Pinborg A, Lidegaard O, la Cour Freiesleben N, Andersen AN. Consequences of vanishing twins in IVF/ICSI pregnancies. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:2821–2829
  60. De Sutter P, Delbaere I, Gerris J, Verstraelen H, Goetgeluk S, Van der Elst J, et al. Birthweight of singletons after assisted reproduction is higher after single- than after double-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2633–2637
  61. Pinborg A, Lidegaard O, la Cour Freiesleben N, Andersen AN. Vanishing twins: a predictor of small-for-gestational age in IVF singletons. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:2707–2714
  62. Luke B, Brown MB, Grainger DA, Stern JE, Klein N, Cedars M. The effect of early fetal losses on singleton assisted-conception pregnancy outcomes. Fertil Steril. In press.
  63. Luke B, Brown MB, Grainger DA, Klein N, Stern JE, Cedars MI. Impact of embryo transfer number on singleton implantation pregnancy outcome. 64th annual meeting, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, San Francisco, California, November 8–12, 2008. Fertil Steril 2008;90:S70.
  64. De Sutter P, Bontinck J, Schutysers V, Van der Elst J, Gerris J, Dhont M. First-trimester bleeding after assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:1907–1911
  65. Van Peperstraten AM, Kreuwel IA, Hermens RP, Nelen WL, Van Dop PA, Grol RP, et al. Determinants of the choice for single or double embryo transfer in twin prone couples. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87:226–231
  66. de Lacey S, Davies M, Homan G, Briggs N, Norman RJ. Factors and perceptions that influence women's decisions to have a single embryo transferred. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;15:526–531
  67. Sharara FI, McClamrock HD. Differences in in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome between white and black women in an inner-city, university-based IVF program. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:1170–1173
  68. Nichols JE, Higdon HL, Crane MM, Boone WR. Comparison of implantation and pregnancy rates in African American and White women in an assisted reproductive technology practice. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:80–84
  69. Purcell K, Schembri M, Frazier LM, Rall MJ, Shen S, Croughan M, et al. Asian ethnicity is associated with reduced pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:297–302
  70. Seifer DB, Frazier LM, Grainger DA. Disparity in assisted reproductive technologies outcomes in black women compared with white women. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:1701–1710
  71. Tesarik J. Paternal effects on cell division in the human preimplantation embryo. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10:370–375
  72. Gupta S, Goldberg JM, Aziz N, Goldberg E, Krajcir N, Agarwal A. Pathogenic mechanisms in endometriosis-associated infertility. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:247–257
  73. Matalliotakis IM, Cakmak H, Mahutte N, Fragouli Y, Arici A, Sakkas D. Women with advanced-stage endometriosis and previous surgery respond less well to gonadotropins stimulation, but have similar IVF implantation and delivery rates compared with women with tubal factor infertility. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:1568–1572
  74. Ragni G, Somigliana E, Benedetti F, Paffoni A, Vegetti W, Restelli L, et al. Damage to ovarian reserve associated with laparoscopic excision of endometriomas: a quantitative rather than qualitative injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1908–1914
  75. Barmat LI, Rauch E, Spandorfer S, Kowalik A, Sills ES, Schattman G, et al. The effect of hydrosalpinges on IVF-ET outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1999;16:350–354
  76. Hammadieh N, Coomarasamy A, Ola B, Papaioannou S, Afnan M, Sharif K. Ultrasound-guided hydrosalphinx aspiration during oocyte collection improves pregnancy outcome in IVF: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1113–1117

 B.L. has nothing to disclose. M.B. has nothing to disclose. D.G. has nothing to disclose. M.C. has nothing to disclose. N.K. has nothing to disclose. J.S. has nothing to disclose.

 Supported by the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.

PII: S0015-0282(09)00504-4

doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.077

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 93, Issue 2 , Pages 490-498 , 15 January 2010

Article Tools