Fertility and Sterility
Volume 94, Issue 4 , Pages 1296-1301, September 2010

Single and multidose pharmacokinetic study of a vaginal micronized progesterone insert (Endometrin) compared with vaginal gel in healthy reproductive-aged female subjects

  • Emily J. Blake, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Parsippany, New Jersey
  • ,
  • Paul M. Norris, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Division of Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
  • ,
  • Sally Faith Dorfman, M.D., MSHSA.

      Affiliations

    • Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Parsippany, New Jersey
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Sally Faith Dorfman, M.D., MSHSA., Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 4 Gatehall Drive, Third Floor, Parsippany, NJ 07054 (FAX: 973-796-1663).
  • ,
  • James Longstreth, Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Longstreth & Associates, Inc., Mundelein, Illinois
  • ,
  • Vladimir I. Yankov, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Parsippany, New Jersey

Received 27 February 2008; received in revised form 7 May 2009; accepted 3 June 2009. published online 15 July 2009.

Objective

To determine pharmacokinetic profiles of two times a day and three times a day dosage regimens of Endometrin, a micronized progesterone vaginal insert for luteal support in assisted reproductive technology, compared with a gel.

Design

A single-center, randomized, open-label, single-day, and multiple-day (5 days) parallel design pharmacokinetic study.

Setting

University clinical research unit.

Patient(s)

Three groups of six healthy subjects, ages 18 to 40 years.

Intervention(s)

Endometrin vaginal inserts two times a day or three times a day, or gel daily.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Pharmacokinetic profiles.

Result(s)

Progesterone serum concentrations increased rapidly following administration of Endometrin vaginal insert, producing higher peak concentrations (Cmax) and clearing faster than gel. On the single day of dosing, mean Cmax was 17.0 ± 2.7 ng/mL in the two times a day group, 19.8 ± 2.9 ng/mL in the three times a day group, and 6.82 ± 1.69 ng/mL in the gel group. Endometrin treatments reached steady state within the first 2 days (24–36 hours), much more rapidly than the gel, which had not reached steady state by 5 days. At 5 days, the Endometrin treatments produced sustained progesterone concentrations exceeding 10 mg/mL across 24 hours.

Conclusions

Endometrin vaginal inserts reached higher Cmax, produced greater systemic exposure (area under the curve 0–24), achieved steady state more rapidly, and cleared more rapidly after termination of therapy than the comparator.

Key Words: Endometrin, progesterone, progesterone supplementation, luteal support, assisted reproductive technology, vaginal, pharmacokinetics, PK, in vitro fertilization, IVF

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 E.J.B. has nothing to disclose. P.M.N. has nothing to disclose. S.F.D. has nothing to disclose. J.L. has nothing to disclose. V.I.Y. has nothing to disclose.

 Supported by Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Inc., of Parsippany, NJ.

PII: S0015-0282(09)01311-9

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.06.014

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 94, Issue 4 , Pages 1296-1301, September 2010