« Previous
Next »
Fertility and Sterility
Volume 92, Issue 5
, Pages 1513-1514
, November 2009
ASRM Practice Committee response to Rybak and Lieman: elective self-donation of oocytes
References
- Grifo JA, Noyes N. Delivery rate using cryopreserved oocytes is comparable to conventional in vitro fertilization using fresh oocytes: potential fertility preservation for female cancer patients. Fertil Steril. Published online May 11, 2009 [Epub ahead of print].
- Report of four donor-recipient oocyte cryopreservation cycles resulting in high pregnancy and implantation rates. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:189;e13–7
- . Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:1657–1664
- Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2849–2858
- In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:9–17
- Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2806–2812
- . Perspectives on the efficacy and indications for preimplantation genetic screening: where are we now?. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2617–2621
- . Essential elements of informed consent for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a practice committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:S134–S135
- . Ovarian tissue and oocyte cyropreservation. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:S241–S246
No reprints will be available.
PII: S0015-0282(09)03686-3
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.007
« Previous
Next »
Fertility and Sterility
Volume 92, Issue 5
, Pages 1513-1514
, November 2009

