« Previous
Next »
Fertility and Sterility
Volume 94, Issue 2
, Pages 761-763
, July 2010
The efficiency of progesterone vaginal gel versus intramuscular progesterone for luteal phase supplementation in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles: a prospective clinical trial
References
- Pituitary gonadotrophin secretory capacity during the luteal phase in superovulation using GnRH-agonists and HMG in a desensitization or flare-up protocol. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:1225–1229
- . Comparison of LH concentrations in the early and mid-luteal phase in IVF cycles after treatment with hMG alone or in association with the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:663–667
- The luteal phase of nonsupplemented cycles after ovarian superovulation with human menopausal gonadotropin and the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix. Fertil Steril. 1998;70:357–359
- . A pilot study involving minimal ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: extending the “follicle-stimulating hormone window” combined with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cetrorelix. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:1051–1054
- Nonsupplemented luteal phase characteristics after the administration of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin, recombinant luteinizing hormone, or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to induce final oocyte maturation in in vitro fertilization patients after ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and GnRH antagonist cotreatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:4186–4192
- . Abnormal endometrial development occurs during the luteal phase of nonsupplemented donor cycles treated with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:464–466
- . Luteal hormonal profile of oocyte donors stimulated with a GnRH antagonist compared with natural cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13:326–330
- . Pharmacokinetics and endometrial tissue levels of progesterone after administration by intramuscular and vaginal routes: a comparative study. Fertil Steril. 1994;62:485–490
- . Crinone 8% vaginal progesterone gel results in lower embryonic implantation efficiency after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:830–836
- . Luteal phase support in infertility treatment: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2287–2299
- . Luteal support in IVF using the novel vaginal progesterone gel Crinone 8%: results of an open-label trial in 1184 women from 16 US centers. Fertil Steril. 2000;74:836–837
- . Experience with progesterone gel for luteal support in a highly successful IVF programme. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1284–1288
- . Comparison of Crinone 8% intravaginal gel and intramuscular progesterone supplementation for in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer in women under age 40: interim analysis of a prospective randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:485–487
- . Experience with a novel vaginal progesterone preparation in a donor oocyte program. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:96–101
- . Luteal support for IVF/ICSI cycles with Crinone 8% (90 mg) twice daily results in higher pregnancy rates than with intramuscular progesterone. J Chin Med Assoc. 2008;71:386–391
- . Use of Crinone vaginal progesterone gel for luteal support in in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:823–829
- Analysis of the bleeding pattern in assisted reproduction cycles with luteal phase supplementation using vaginal micronized progesterone. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1435–1439
- . Luteal phase support in assisted reproductive cycles using either vaginal (Crinone 8) or intramuscular (Prontogest) progesterone: results of a prospective randomized study. Minerva Ginecol. 2001;53:297–301
- . Vaginal gel versus intramuscular progesterone for luteal phase supplementation: a prospective randomized trial. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;16:361–367
S.K. has nothing to disclose. S.H.K. has nothing to disclose. G.K. has nothing to disclose.
PII: S0015-0282(09)03860-6
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.10.004
© 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Fertility and Sterility
Volume 94, Issue 2
, Pages 761-763
, July 2010

