Fertility and Sterility
Volume 95, Issue 3 , Pages 959-963, 1 March 2011

Perinatal outcome of singleton siblings born after assisted reproductive technology and spontaneous conception: Danish national sibling-cohort study

  • Anna-Karina Aaris Henningsen, M.D.

      Affiliations

    • Fertility Clinic, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Anna-Karina Aaris Henningsen, M.D., Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • ,
  • Anja Pinborg, M.D.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • Fertility Clinic, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • ,
  • Øjvind Lidegaard, M.D.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • ,
  • Christina Vestergaard, M.P.H.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • ,
  • Julie Lyng Forman, M.Sc., Ph.D.

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • ,
  • Anders Nyboe Andersen, M.D.Sc.

      Affiliations

    • Fertility Clinic, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Received 7 April 2010; received in revised form 6 July 2010; accepted 22 July 2010. published online 02 September 2010.

Objective

To compare the perinatal outcome of singleton siblings conceived differently.

Design

National population-based registry study.

Setting

Denmark, from 1994 to 2008.

Patient(s)

Pairs of siblings (13,692 pairs; n = 27,384 children) conceived after IVF, intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI), frozen embryo replacement (FER), or spontaneous conception subcategorized into five groups according to succession: [1] IVF-ICSI vs. spontaneous conception (n = 7,758), [2] IVF-ICSI vs. FER (n = 716), [3] FER vs. FER (n = 34), [4] IVF-ICSI vs. IVF-ICSI (n = 2,876), and [5] spontaneous conception vs. spontaneous conception (n = 16,000).

Intervention(s)

Observations were obtained from national registries.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Birth weight, gestational age, low birth weight (<2,500 g), preterm birth (<37 weeks’ gestation) and perinatal deaths.

Result(s)

Mean birth weight was 65 g (95% confidence interval [CI], 41–89] lower in all assisted reproductive technology children compared with their spontaneously conceived siblings. FER children were 167 g (95% CI, 90–244] heavier than siblings born after replacement of fresh embryos. The difference in birth weight between firstborn and second born sibling depended on order of conception method. Higher risk of low birth weight with (odds ratio [OR], 1.4; 95%CI, 1.1–1.7] and preterm birth (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1–1.6] was observed in IVF/ICSI compared with spontaneous conception.

Conclusion(s)

When differentiating between order and mode of conception, it seems that assisted reproductive technology plays a role in mean birth weight and risk of low birth weight and preterm birth. Birth weight was higher in siblings born after FER compared with fresh embryos replacement.

Key Words: Perinatal outcome, singleton siblings, maternal factors, ART

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 A-K.A.H. has nothing to disclose. A.P. has nothing to disclose. Ø.L. has nothing to disclose. C.V. has nothing to disclose. J.L.F. has nothing to disclose. A.N.A. has nothing to disclose.

PII: S0015-0282(10)02201-6

doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.07.1075

Fertility and Sterility
Volume 95, Issue 3 , Pages 959-963, 1 March 2011