Advertisement

What’s the delay? A qualitative study of women’s experiences of reaching a diagnosis of endometriosis

      Objective

      To investigate the reasons women experience delays in the diagnosis of endometriosis and the impact of this.

      Design

      A qualitative interview-based study of 32 women, 28 of whom were subsequently diagnosed with endometriosis.

      Setting

      Southeast England.

      Patient(s)

      Women attending a pelvic pain clinic.

      Intervention(s)

      Semistructured interviews.

      Main Outcome Measure(s)

      Women’s reported experiences of being diagnosed with endometriosis.

      Result(s)

      Delays in the diagnosis of endometriosis occur at an individual patient level and a medical level, as both women and family doctors normalize symptoms, symptoms are suppressed through hormones, and nondiscriminatory investigations are relied upon. Women benefited from a diagnosis, because it provided a language in which to discuss their condition, offered possible management strategies to control symptoms, and provided reassurance that symptoms were not due to cancer. Diagnosis also sanctioned women’s access to social support and legitimized absences from social and work obligations.

      Conclusion(s)

      Although recent guidelines for the management of chronic pelvic pain suggest that diagnostic laparoscopy may be considered a secondary investigation after the failure of therapeutic interventions, the present study highlights the importance of an early diagnosis for women who suffer at physical, emotional, and social levels when they remain undiagnosed.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Fertility and Sterility
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Mathias S.D.
        • Kuppermann M.
        • Liberman R.F.
        • Lipschutz R.C.
        • Steege J.F.
        Chronic pelvic pain: prevalence, health-related quality of life, and economic correlates.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 87: 321-327
        • Zondervan K.T.
        • Yudkin P.L.
        • Vessey M.P.
        • Dawes M.G.
        • Barlow D.H.
        • Kennedy S.H.
        The community prevalence of chronic pelvic pain in women and associated illness behaviour.
        Br J Gen Pract. 2001; 51: 541-547
        • Grace V.M.
        • Zondervan K.T.
        Chronic pelvic pain in New Zealand: prevalence, pain severity, diagnoses and use of the health services.
        Aust N Z J Pub Health. 2004; 28 (369–75): 4
        • Vigano P.
        • Parazzini F.
        • Somigliana E.
        • Vercellini P.
        Endometriosis: epidemiology and aetiological factors.
        Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2004; 182: 177-200
        • Redwine D.B.
        Mulleriosis: the single best-fit model of the origin of endometriosis.
        J Reprod Med. 1988; 3311: 915-920
        • Garry R.
        The endometriosis syndromes: a clinical classification in the presence of aetiological confusion and therapeutic anarchy.
        Hum Reprod. 2004; 194: 760-768
        • Kjerulff K.H.
        • Erikson B.A.
        • Langenberg P.W.
        Chronic gynaecological conditions reported by US women: findings from a national health interview survey 1984–1992.
        Am J Pub Health. 1996; 86: 195-199
        • Whelan E.
        Putting pain to paper: endometriosis and the documentation of suffering.
        Health (Lond). 2003; 74: 463-482
        • Garry R.
        • Clayton R.
        • Hawe J.
        The effect of endometriosis and its radical laparoscopic excision on quality of life indicators.
        BJOG. 2000; 1071: 44-54
        • Wright J.
        • Shafik A.
        Quality of life following excision of rectovaginal endometriosis associated with complete obliteration of the posterior cul de sac.
        Gynaecol Endosc. 2001; 10: 107-111
        • Abbott J.A.
        • Hawe J.
        • Clayton R.D.
        • Garry R.
        The effects and effectiveness of laparoscopic excision of endometriosis: a prospective study with 2–5 year follow-up.
        Hum Reprod. 2003; 189: 1922-1927
        • Peveler R.
        • Edwards J.
        • Thomas E.
        Psychosocial factors and chronic pelvic pain: a comparison of women with endometriosis and with unexplained pain.
        J Psychosom Res. 1996; 403: 305-315
        • Hadfield R.
        • Mardon H.
        • Barlow D.
        • Kennedy S.
        Delay in the diagnosis of endometriosis: a survey of women from the USA and the UK.
        Hum Reprod. 1996; 114: 878-880
        • Husby G.K.
        • Haugen R.S.
        • Moen M.H.
        Diagnostic delay in women with pain and endometriosis.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003; 827: 649-653
        • Dmowski W.P.
        • Lesniewicz R.
        • Rana N.
        • Pepping P.
        • Noursalehi M.
        Changing trends in the diagnosis of endometriosis: a comparative study of women with pelvic endometriosis presenting with chronic pelvic pain or infertility.
        Fertil Steril. 1997; 672: 238-243
        • Arruda M.S.
        • Petta C.A.
        • Abrao M.S.
        • Benetti-Pinto C.L.
        Time elapsed from onset of symptoms to diagnosis of endometriosis in a cohort study of Brazilian women.
        Hum Reprod. 2003; 184: 756-759
        • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
        The initial management of chronic pelvic pain. RCOG, London2005 (Guideline number 41; April)
        • Moore J.
        • Copley S.
        • Morris J.
        • Lindsell D.
        • Golding S.
        • Kennedy S.
        A systematic review of the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of endometriosis.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 20: 630-634
        • Bazot M.
        • Thomassin I.
        • Hourani R.
        • Cortez A.
        • Darai E.
        Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for deep pelvic endometriosis.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 242: 180-185
        • Kuligowska E.
        • Deeds L.
        • Lu K.
        Pelvic pain: overlooked and underdiagnosed gynecologic conditions.
        Radiographics. 2005; 251: 3-20
        • Kennedy S.
        • Bennett S.
        • Weeks D.E.
        Genetics and infertility: affected sib-pair analysis in endometriosis.
        Hum Reprod. 2001; 74: 411-418
        • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
        The investigation and management of endometriosis. RCOG, London2000 (Guideline number 24; July)
        • Jansen F.W.
        • Kapiteyn K.
        • Trimbos-Kemper T.
        • Hermans J.
        • Trimbos J.B.
        Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study.
        BJOG. 1997; 1045: 595-600
        • Chapron C.
        • Querleu D.
        • Bruhat M.
        • Madelenat P.
        • Fernandez H.
        • Pierre F.
        • et al.
        Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynaecological laparoscopy: a series of 29,966 cases.
        Hum Reprod. 1998; 13: 867-872
        • Moore J.
        • Ziebland S.
        • Kennedy S.
        “People sometimes react funny if they’re not told enough”; women’s views about the risks of diagnostic laparoscopy.
        Health Expectat. 2002; 5: 302-309