Multiple gestation associated with infertility therapy: an American Society for Reproductive Medicine Practice Committee opinion

  • Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
      The purpose of this committee opinion, which replaces the 2006 ASRM Practice Committee document titled Multiple Pregnancy Associated with Infertility Therapy, is to provide physicians with pertinent information that may help to avoid multiple gestations and to aid in patient counseling regarding the associated risks.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Martin J.A.
        • Hamilton B.E.
        • Sutton P.D.
        • Ventura S.J.
        • Mathews M.S.
        • Osterman M.J.
        • et al.
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System
        Births: final data for 2008.
        Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010; 58: 1-85
        • Jones Jr., H.W.
        Iatrogenic multiple births: a 2003 checkup.
        Fertil Steril. 2007; 87: 453-455
        • Reynolds M.A.
        • Schieve L.A.
        • Martin J.A.
        • Jeng G.
        • Macaluso M.
        Trends in multiple births conceived using assisted reproductive technology, US, 1997–2000.
        Pediatrics. 2003; 111: 1159-1162
        • Adashi E.Y.
        • Barri P.N.
        • Berkowitz R.
        • Braude P.
        • Bryan E.
        • Carr J.
        • et al.
        Infertility therapy-associated multiple pregnancies (births): an ongoing epidemic.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2003; 7: 515-542
        • Dickey R.P.
        The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the US 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred.
        Fertil Steril. 2007; 88: 1554-1561
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        Contribution of assisted reproductive technology and ovulation-inducing drugs to triplet and higher-order multiple births—US, 1980–1997.
        MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2000; 49: 535-538
        • White C.
        • Wyshak G.
        Inheritance in human dizygotic twinning.
        N Engl J Med. 1964; 271: 1003-1005
        • MacGillivray I.
        Epidemiology of twin pregnancy.
        Semin Perinatol. 1986; 10: 4-8
        • Norwitz E.R.
        Multiple pregnancy: trends past, present, and future.
        Infertil Reprod Med Clin North Am. 1998; 9: 351-369
        • Kiely J.L.
        • Kleinman J.C.
        • Kiely M.
        Triplets and higher-order multiple births. Time trends and infant mortality.
        Am J Dis Child. 1992; 146: 862-868
        • Bulmer M.C.
        The biology of twinning.
        Oxford University Press, London1970
        • Abusheikha N.
        • Salha O.
        • Sharma V.
        • Brinsden P.
        Monozygotic twinning and IVF/ICSI treatment: a report of 11 cases and review of literature.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2000; 6: 396-403
        • Toledo M.G.
        Is there increased monozygotic twinning after assisted reproductive technology?.
        Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005; 45: 360-364
        • Tur R.
        • Barri P.N.
        • Coroleu B.
        • Buxaderas R.
        • Parera N.
        • Balasch J.
        Use of a prediction model for high-order multiple implantation after ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins.
        Fertil Steril. 2005; 83: 116-121
        • Derom C.
        • Vlietinck R.
        • Derom R.
        • van den Berghe H.
        • Thiery M.
        Increased monozygotic twinning rate after ovulation induction.
        Lancet. 1987; 1: 1236-1238
        • Templeton A.
        • Morris J.K.
        Reducing the risk of multiple births by transfer of two embryos after in vitro fertilization.
        N Engl J Med. 1998; 339: 573-577
        • Jain T.
        • Missmer S.A.
        • Hornstein M.D.
        Trends in embryo-transfer practice and in outcomes of the use of assisted reproductive technology in the US.
        N Engl J Med. 2004; 350: 1639-1645
        • Saito H.
        • Tsutsumi O.
        • Noda Y.
        • Ibuki Y.
        • Hiroi M.
        Do assisted reproductive technologies have effects on the demography of monozygotic twinning?.
        Fertil Steril. 2000; 74: 178-179
        • Alikani M.
        • Noyes N.
        • Cohen J.
        • Rosenwaks Z.
        Monozygotic twinning in the human is associated with the zona pellucida architecture.
        Hum Reprod. 1994; 9: 1318-1321
        • Alikani M.
        • Cekleniak N.A.
        • Walters E.
        • Cohen J.
        Monozygotic twinning following assisted conception: an analysis of 81 consecutive cases.
        Hum Reprod. 2003; 18: 1937-1943
        • Das S.
        • Blake D.
        • Farquhar C.
        • Seif M.M.W.
        Assisted hatching on assisted conception (IVF and ICSI).
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; : CD001894
        • Moayeri S.E.
        • Behr B.
        • Lathi R.B.
        • Westphal L.M.
        • Milki A.A.
        Risk of monozygotic twinning with blastocyst transfer decreases over time: an 8-year experience.
        Fertil Steril. 2007; 87: 1028-1032
        • Skiadas C.C.
        • Missmer S.A.
        • Benson C.B.
        • Gee R.E.
        • Racowsky C.
        Risk factors associated with pregnancies containing a monochorionic pair following assisted reproductive technologies.
        Hum Reprod. 2008; 23: 1366-1371
        • Ombelet W.
        • de Sutter P.
        • van der Elst J.
        • Martens G.
        Multiple gestation and infertility treatment: registration, reflection and reaction—the Belgian project.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2005; 11: 3-14
        • Martin J.A.
        • Hamilton B.E.
        • Sutton P.D.
        • Ventura S.J.
        • Menacker F.
        • Munson M.L.
        Births: final data for 2002.
        Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2003; 52: 1-113
        • Henderson C.E.
        • Scarpelli S.
        • LaRosa D.
        • Divon M.Y.
        Assessing the risk of gestational diabetes in twin gestation.
        J Natl Med Assoc. 1995; 87: 757-758
        • Wein P.
        • Warwick M.M.
        • Beischer N.A.
        Gestational diabetes in twin pregnancy: prevalence and long-term implications.
        Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992; 32: 325-327
        • Adams D.M.
        • Sholl J.S.
        • Haney E.I.
        • Russell T.L.
        • Silver R.K.
        Perinatal outcome associated with outpatient management of triplet pregnancy.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 178: 843-847
        • Martin J.A.
        • MacDorman M.F.
        • Mathews T.J.
        Triplet births: trends and outcomes, 1971–94.
        Vital Health Stat 21. 1997; : 1-20
      1. March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation (a joint document of the March of Dimes, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine). Multiple pregnancy and birth: considering fertility treatments. September 2006. Available at: http://www.marchofdimes.com/files/ACOG_ASRM_MOD_ART_Consumer_FINAL_9-14-06.pdf. Accessed April 2008.

        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, ACOG Joint Editorial Committee
        ACOG practice bulletin no. 56: multiple gestation: complicated twin, triplet, and high-order multifetal pregnancy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 104: 869-883
        • Seoud M.A.
        • Toner J.P.
        • Kruithoff C.
        • Muasher S.J.
        Outcome of twin, triplet, and quadruplet in vitro fertilization pregnancies: the Norfolk experience.
        Fertil Steril. 1992; 57: 825-834
        • Albrecht J.L.
        • Tomich P.G.
        The maternal and neonatal outcome of triplet gestations.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 174: 1551-1556
        • Kauppila A.
        • Jouppila P.
        • Koivisto M.
        • Moilanen I.
        • Ylikorkala O.
        Twin pregnancy. A clinical study of 335 cases.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1975; 44: 5-12
        • Tallo C.P.
        • Vohr B.
        • Oh W.
        • Rubin L.P.
        • Seifer D.B.
        • Haning Jr., R.V.
        Maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with in vitro fertilization.
        J Pediatr. 1995; 127: 794-800
        • Moise J.
        • Laor A.
        • Armon Y.
        • Gur I.
        • Gale R.
        The outcome of twin pregnancies after IVF.
        Hum Reprod. 1998; 13: 1702-1705
        • Helmerhorst F.M.
        • Perquin D.A.
        • Donker D.
        • Keirse M.J.
        Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies.
        BMJ. 2004; 328: 261
        • Jackson R.A.
        • Gibson K.A.
        • Wu Y.W.
        • Croughan M.S.
        Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103: 551-563
        • D’Alton M.E.
        • Mercer B.M.
        Antepartum management of twin gestation: ultrasound.
        Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 33: 42-51
        • Torok O.
        • Lapinski R.
        • Salafia C.M.
        • Bernasko J.
        • Berkowitz R.L.
        Multifetal pregnancy reduction is not associated with an increased risk of intrauterine growth restriction, except for very-high-order multiples.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 179: 221-225
        • Evans M.I.
        • Britt D.W.
        Fetal reduction.
        Semin Perinatol. 2005; 29: 321-329
        • Blondel B.
        • Kogan M.D.
        • Alexander G.R.
        • Dattani N.
        • Kramer M.S.
        • Macfarlane A.
        • et al.
        The impact of the increasing number of multiple births on the rates of preterm birth and low birthweight: an international study.
        Am J Public Health. 2002; 92: 1323-1330
        • Kahn B.
        • Lumey L.H.
        • Zybert P.A.
        • Lorenz J.M.
        • Cleary-Goldman J.
        • d’Alton M.E.
        • et al.
        Prospective risk of fetal death in singleton, twin, and triplet gestations: implications for practice.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102: 685-692
        • Tummers P.
        • De Sutter P.
        • Dhont M.
        Risk of spontaneous abortion in singleton and twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI.
        Hum Reprod. 2003; 18: 1720-1723
        • Landy H.J.
        • Keith L.G.
        The vanishing twin: a review.
        Hum Reprod Update. 1998; 4: 177-183
        • Corson S.L.
        • Dickey R.P.
        • Gocial B.
        • Batzer F.R.
        • Eisenberg E.
        • Huppert L.
        • et al.
        Outcome in 242 in vitro fertilization-embryo replacement or gamete intrafallopian transfer-induced pregnancies.
        Fertil Steril. 1989; 51: 644-650
        • Landy H.J.
        • Weiner S.
        • Corson S.L.
        • Batzer F.R.
        • Bolognese R.J.
        The “vanishing twin”: ultrasonographic assessment of fetal disappearance in the first trimester.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986; 155: 14-19
        • de Sutter P.
        • Delbaere I.
        • Gerris J.
        • Verstraelen H.
        • Goetgeluk S.
        • van der Elst J.
        • et al.
        Birthweight of singletons after assisted reproduction is higher after single- than after double-embryo transfer.
        Hum Reprod. 2006; 21: 2633-2637
        • Pinborg A.
        • Lidegaard O.
        • la Cour Freiesleben N.
        • Andersen A.N.
        Consequences of vanishing twins in IVF/ICSI pregnancies.
        Hum Reprod. 2005; 20: 2821-2829
        • Pinborg A.
        • Lidegaard O.
        • Freiesleben N.C.
        • Andersen A.N.
        Vanishing twins: a predictor of small-for-gestational age in IVF singletons.
        Hum Reprod. 2007; 22: 2707-2714
        • Anand D.
        • Platt M.J.
        • Pharoah P.O.
        Vanishing twin: a possible cause of cerebral impairment.
        Twin Res Hum Genet. 2007; 10: 202-209
        • Dudley D.K.
        • d’Alton M.E.
        Single fetal death in twin gestation.
        Semin Perinatol. 1986; 10: 65-72
        • Burke M.S.
        Single fetal demise in twin gestation.
        Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 33: 69-78
        • Fusi L.
        • Gordon H.
        Twin pregnancy complicated by single intrauterine death. Problems and outcome with conservative management.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990; 97: 511-516
        • Strong Jr., T.H.
        • Brar H.S.
        Placenta previa in twin gestations.
        J Reprod Med. 1989; 34: 415-416
        • Benirschke K.
        The biology of the twinning process: how placentation influences outcome.
        Semin Perinatol. 1995; 19: 342-350
        • Merenkov K.E.
        Psychiatric considerations after the birth of multiples.
        in: Keith L.G. Papiernik E. Keith D.M. Luke B. Multiple pregnancy. Parthenon, New York1995: 573-581
        • Collins J.
        Cost efficiency of reducing multiple births.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2007; 15: 35-39
        • Wright V.C.
        • Chang J.
        • Jeng G.
        • Chen M.
        • Macaluso M.
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
        Assisted reproductive technology surveillance—US, 2004.
        MMWR Surveill Summ. 2007; 56: 1-22
        • Jain T.
        • Harlow B.L.
        • Hornstein M.D.
        Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization.
        N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 661-666
        • Henne M.B.
        • Bundorf M.K.
        Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments.
        Fertil Steril. 2008; 89: 66-73
        • Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine
        Guidelines on number of embryos transferred.
        Fertil Steril. 2008; 90: S163-S164
        • Stern J.E.
        • Cedars M.I.
        • Jain T.
        • Klein N.A.
        • Beaird C.M.
        • Grainger D.A.
        • et al.
        • Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Writing Group
        Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the US.
        Fertil Steril. 2007; 88: 275-282
      2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Annual ART success rates reports. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ART/ARTReports.htm. Accessed November 2011.

      3. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Clinic summary report. Available at: https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=0. Accessed November 2011.

        • Saldeen P.
        • Sundström P.
        Would legislation imposing single embryo transfer be a feasible way to reduce the rate of multiple pregnancies after IVF treatment?.
        Hum Reprod. 2005; 20: 4-8
        • Karlström P.O.
        • Bergh C.
        Reducing the number of embryos transferred in Sweden—impact on delivery and multiple birth rates.
        Hum Reprod. 2007; 22: 2202-2207
        • de Mouzon J.
        • Goossens V.
        • Bhattacharya S.
        • Castilla J.A.
        • Ferraretti A.P.
        • Korsak V.
        • et al.
        Assisted reproductive technology in Europe: results generated from European registries by ESHRE.
        Hum Reprod. 2010; 25: 1851-1862
        • Gerris J.
        • de Sutter P.
        Elective single embryo transfer.
        in: Carrell D.T. Schlegel P. van Voorhis B. Racowsky C. Biennial review of reproduction. Humana, Totawa (NJ)2008: 171-183
        • McLernon D.J.
        • Harrild K.
        • Bergh C.
        • Davies M.J.
        • de Neubourg D.
        • Dumoulin J.C.
        • et al.
        Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials.
        BMJ. 2010; 341: c6945
        • Thurin A.
        • Hausken J.
        • Hillensjö T.
        • Jablonowska B.
        • Pinborg A.
        • Strandell A.
        • et al.
        Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization.
        N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 2392-2402
        • van Montfoort A.P.
        • Fiddelers A.A.
        • Janssen J.M.
        • Derhaag J.G.
        • Dirksen C.D.
        • Dunselman G.A.
        • et al.
        In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
        Hum Reprod. 2006; 21: 338-343
        • Ryan G.L.
        • Sparks A.E.
        • Sipe C.S.
        • Syrop C.H.
        • Dokras A.
        • van Voorhis B.J.
        A mandatory single blastocyst transfer policy with educational campaign in a US IVF program reduces multiple gestation rates without sacrificing pregnancy rates.
        Fertil Steril. 2007; 88: 354-360
        • Rijinders P.M.
        • van Os H.C.
        • Jansen C.A.M.
        Increased incidence of monozygotic twinning following the transfer of blastocysts in human IVF/ICSI.
        Fertil Steril. 1998; 70: S15-S16
        • Milki A.A.
        • Jun S.H.
        • Hinkley M.D.
        • Behr B.
        • Giudice L.C.
        • Westphal L.M.
        Incidence of monozygotic twinning with blastocyst compared to cleavage-stage transfer.
        Fertil Steril. 2003; 79: 503-506
        • Sheiner E.
        • Har-Vardi I.
        • Potashnik G.
        The potential association between blastocyst transfer and monozygotic twinning.
        Fertil Steril. 2001; 75: 217-218
        • Papanikolaou E.G.
        • Camus M.
        • Kolibianakis E.M.
        • van Landuyt L.
        • van Steirteghem A.
        • Devroey P.
        In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos.
        N Engl J Med. 2006; 354: 1139-1146
        • Rivera P.
        • Stein P.
        • Weaver J.R.
        • Mager J.
        • Schultz R.M.
        • Bartolomei M.S.
        Manipulations of mouse embryos prior to implantation result in aberrant expression of imprinted genes on day 9.5 of development.
        Hum Mol Genet. 2008; 17: 1-14
        • Niemitz E.L.
        • Feinberg A.P.
        Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technology: a call for investigation.
        Am J Hum Genet. 2004; 74: 599-609
      4. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Elective single embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2012;97:835–42.

        • Lukassen H.G.
        • Braat D.D.
        • Wetzels A.M.
        • Zielhuis G.A.
        • Adang E.M.
        • Scheenjes E.
        • et al.
        Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
        Hum Reprod. 2005; 20: 702-708
        • Gardner D.K.
        • Vella P.
        • Lane M.
        • Wagley L.
        • Schlenker T.
        • Schoolcraft W.B.
        Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers.
        Fertil Steril. 1998; 69: 84-88
        • Milki A.A.
        • Fisch J.D.
        • Behr B.
        Two-blastocyst transfer has similar pregnancy rates and a decreased multiple gestation rate compared with three-blastocyst transfer.
        Fertil Steril. 1999; 72: 225-228
        • Marek D.
        • Langley M.
        • Gardner D.K.
        • Confer N.
        • Doody K.M.
        • Doody K.J.
        Introduction of blastocyst culture and transfer for all patients in an in vitro fertilization program.
        Fertil Steril. 1999; 72: 1035-1040
        • Newton C.R.
        • McBride J.
        • Feyles V.
        • Tekpetey F.
        • Power S.
        Factors affecting patients’ attitudes toward single- and multiple-embryo transfer.
        Fertil Steril. 2007; 87: 269-278
        • Olivius C.
        • Friden B.
        • Lundin K.
        • Bergh C.
        Cumulative probability of live birth after three in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.
        Fertil Steril. 2002; 77: 505-510
        • Olivius C.
        • Friden B.
        • Borg G.
        • Bergh C.
        Why do couples discontinue in vitro fertilization treatment? A cohort study.
        Fertil Steril. 2004; 81: 258-278
        • Daya S.
        Life table (survival) analysis to generate cumulative pregnancy rates in assisted reproduction: are we overestimating our success rates?.
        Hum Reprod. 2005; 20: 1135-1143
        • Hope N.
        • Rombauts L.
        Can an educational DVD improve the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer? A randomized controlled study.
        Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: 489-495
        • Murray S.
        • Shetty A.
        • Rattray A.
        • Taylor V.
        • Bhattacharya S.
        A randomized comparison of alternative methods of information provision on the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer.
        Hum Reprod. 2004; 19: 911-916
        • Guzick D.S.
        • Carson S.A.
        • Coutifaris C.
        • Overstreet J.W.
        • Factor-Litvak P.
        • Steinkampf M.P.
        • et al.
        • National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network
        Efficacy of superovulation and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility.
        N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 177-183
        • Ragni G.
        • Maggioni P.
        • Guermandi E.
        • Testa A.
        • Baroni E.
        • Colombo M.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of double intrauterine insemination in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles.
        Fertil Steril. 1999; 72: 619-622
        • Gleicher N.
        • Oleske D.M.
        • Tur-Kaspa I.
        • Vidali A.
        • Karande V.
        Reducing the risk of high-order multiple pregnancy after ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins.
        N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 2-7
        • Rosen M.P.
        • Shen S.
        • Dobson A.T.
        • Rinaudo P.F.
        • McCulloch C.E.
        • Cedars M.I.
        A quantitative assessment of follicle size on oocyte developmental competence.
        Fertil Steril. 2008; 90: 684-690
        • Ragni G.
        • Caliari I.
        • Nicolosi A.E.
        • Arnoldi M.
        • Somigliana E.
        • Crosignani P.G.
        Preventing high-order multiple pregnancies during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination: 3 years’ experience using low-dose recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists.
        Fertil Steril. 2006; 85: 619-624
        • Papageorgiou T.C.
        • Guibert J.
        • Savale M.
        • Goffinet F.
        • Fournier C.
        • Merlet F.
        • et al.
        Low dose recombinant FSH treatment may reduce multiple gestations caused by controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination.
        BJOG. 2004; 111: 1277-1282
        • Ghesquiere S.L.
        • Castelain E.G.
        • Spiessens C.
        • Meuleman C.L.
        • d’Hooghe T.M.
        Relationship between follicle number and (multiple) live birth rate after controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197: 589.e1-589.e5
        • Reindollar R.H.
        • Regan M.M.
        • Neumann P.J.
        • Levine B.S.
        • Thornton K.L.
        • Alper M.M.
        • et al.
        A randomized clinical trial to evaluate optimal treatment for unexplained infertility: the fast track and standard treatment (FASTT) trial.
        Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: 888-899
        • Albano C.
        • Platteau P.
        • Nogueira D.
        • Cortvrindt R.
        • Smitz J.
        • Devroey P.
        Avoidance of multiple pregnancies after ovulation induction by supernumerary preovulatory follicular reduction.
        Fertil Steril. 2001; 76: 820-822
        • de Geyter C.
        • de Geyter M.
        • Castro E.
        • Bals-Pratsch M.
        • Nieschlag E.
        • Schneider H.P.
        Experience with transvaginal ultrasound-guided aspiration of supernumerary follicles for the prevention of multiple pregnancies after ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination.
        Fertil Steril. 1996; 65: 1163-1168
        • de Geyter C.
        • de Geyter M.
        • Nieschlag E.
        Low multiple pregnancy rates and reduced frequency of cancellation after ovulation induction with gonadotropins, if eventual supernumerary follicles are aspirated to prevent polyovulation.
        J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998; 15: 111-116
        • Evans M.I.
        • Britt D.W.
        Fetal reduction in 2008.
        Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 20: 386-393
        • Evans M.I.
        • Britt D.W.
        Multifetal pregnancy reduction: evolution of the ethical arguments.
        Semin Reprod Med. 2010; 28: 295-302
        • Committee on Ethics
        ACOG committee opinion. No. 369. June 2007. Multifetal pregnancy reduction.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109: 1511-1515
        • Wimalasundera R.C.
        Selective reduction and termination of multiple pregnancies.
        Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010; 15: 327-335
        • Evans M.I.
        • Berkowitz R.I.
        • Wapner R.J.
        • Carpenter R.J.
        • Goldberg J.D.
        • Ayoub M.A.
        • et al.
        Improvement in outcomes of multifetal pregnancy reduction with increased experience.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184: 97-103
        • Chescheir N.C.
        Outcomes of multifetal pregnancy reductions.
        Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 47: 134-145
        • Papageorghiou A.T.
        • Avgidou K.
        • Bakoulas V.
        • Sebire N.J.
        • Nicolaides K.H.
        Risks of miscarriage and early preterm birth in trichorionic triplet pregnancies with embryo reduction versus expectant management: new data and systematic review.
        Hum Reprod. 2006; 21: 1912-1917
        • Stone J.
        • Belogolovkin V.
        • Matho A.
        • Berkowitz R.L.
        • Moshier E.
        • Eddleman K.
        Evolving trends in 2000 cases of multifetal pregnancy reduction: a single center experience.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 197: 394.e1-394.e4
        • Skiadas C.C.
        • Missmer S.A.
        • Benson C.B.
        • Acker D.
        • Racowsky C.
        Impact of selective reduction of the monochorionic pair in in vitro fertilization triplet pregnancies on gestational length.
        Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: 2930-2931
        • Zaner R.M.
        • Boehm F.H.
        • Hill G.A.
        Selective termination in multiple pregnancies: ethical considerations.
        Fertil Steril. 1990; 54: 203-205
        • Garel M.
        • Stark C.
        • Blondel B.
        • Lefebvre G.
        • Vauthier-Brouzes D.
        • Zorn J.R.
        Psychological reactions after multifetal pregnancy reduction: a 2-year follow-up study.
        Hum Reprod. 1997; 12: 617-622
        • Schreiner-Engel P.
        • Walther V.N.
        • Mindes J.
        • Lynch L.
        • Berkowitz R.L.
        First-trimester multifetal pregnancy reduction: acute and persistent psychologic reactions.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 172: 541-547
        • Munks E.B.
        • Edelman A.B.
        • Jensen J.T.
        • Nichols M.D.
        • Burry K.
        • Patton P.
        IVF patients’ attitudes toward multifetal pregnancy reduction.
        J Reprod Med. 2007; 52: 635-638
        • Dodd J.M.
        • Crowther C.A.
        Reduction of the number of fetuses for women with triplet and higher order multiple pregnancies.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003; : CD003932