Advertisement

Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      Objective

      To examine the available evidence to assess if cryopreservation of all embryos and subsequent frozen embryo transfer (FET) results in better outcomes compared with fresh transfer.

      Design

      Systematic review and meta-analysis.

      Setting

      Centers for reproductive care.

      Patient(s)

      Infertility patient(s).

      Intervention(s)

      An exhaustive electronic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed through December 2011. We included randomized clinical trials comparing outcomes of IVF cycles between fresh and frozen embryo transfers.

      Main Outcome Measure(s)

      The outcomes of interest were ongoing pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and miscarriage.

      Result(s)

      We included three trials accounting for 633 cycles in women aged 27–33 years. Data analysis showed that FET resulted in significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rates and clinical pregnancy rates.

      Conclusion(s)

      Our results suggest that there is evidence that IVF outcomes may be improved by performing FET compared with fresh embryo transfer. This could be explained by a better embryo-endometrium synchrony achieved with endometrium preparation cycles.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Fertility and Sterility
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Díaz-Gimeno P.
        • Horcajadas J.A.
        • Martínez-Conejero J.A.
        • Esteban F.J.
        • Alamá P.
        • Pellicer A.
        • et al.
        A genomic diagnostic tool for human endometrial receptivity based on the transcriptomic signature.
        Fertil Steril. 2011; 95: 50-60
        • Achache H.
        • Revel A.
        Endometrial receptivity markers, the journey to successful embryo implantation.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2006; 12: 731-746
        • Bourgain C.
        • Devroey P.
        The endometrium in stimulated cycles for IVF.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2003; 9: 515-522
        • Devroey P.
        • Bourgain C.
        • Macklon N.S.
        • Fauser B.C.
        Reproductive biology and IVF: ovarian stimulation and endometrial receptivity.
        Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2004; 15: 84-90
        • Kolibianakis E.
        • Bourgain C.
        • Albano C.
        • Osmanagaoglu K.
        • Smitz J.
        • Steirteghem A.V.
        • et al.
        Effect of ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone, gonadotropin release hormone antagonists, and human chorionic gonadotropin on endometrial maturation on the day of oocyte pick-up.
        Fertil Steril. 2002; 78: 1025-1029
        • Nikas G.
        • Develioglu O.H.
        • Toner J.P.
        • Jones Jr., H.W.
        Endometrial pinopodes indicate a shift in the window of receptivity in IVF cycles.
        Hum Reprod. 1999; 14: 787-792
        • Simon C.
        • Velasco J.J.G.
        • Valbuena D.
        • Peinado J.A.
        • Moreno C.
        • Remohí J.
        • et al.
        Increasing uterine receptivity by decreasing estradiol levels during the preimplantation period in high responders with the use of a follicle-stimulating hormone step-down regimen.
        Fertil Steril. 1998; 70: 234-239
        • Shapiro B.S.
        • Daneshmand S.T.
        • Garner F.C.
        • Aguirre M.
        • Hudson C.
        • Thomas S.
        High ongoing pregnancy rates after deferred transfer through bipronuclear oocyte cryopreservation and post-thaw extended culture.
        Fertil Steril. 2009; 92: 1594-1599
        • Shapiro B.S.
        • Daneshmand S.T.
        • Garner F.C.
        • Aguire M.
        • Thomas S.
        Large blastocyst diameter, early blastulation, and low preovulatory serum progesterone are dominant predictors of clinical pregnancy in fresh autologous cycles.
        Fertil Steril. 2008; 90: 302-309
        • Richter K.S.
        • Shipley S.K.
        • McVearry I.
        • Tucker M.J.
        • Widra E.A.
        Cryopreserved embryo transfers suggest that endometrial receptivity may contribute to reduced success rates of later developing embryos.
        Fertil Steril. 2006; 86: 862-866
        • Herrero L.
        • Martínez M.
        • Garcia-Velasco J.A.
        Current status of human oocyte and embryo cryopreservation.
        Curr Opin ObstetGynecol. 2011; 23: 245-250
        • Shapiro B.S.
        • Daneshmand S.T.
        • Garner F.C.
        • Aguirre M.
        • Hudson C.
        • Thomas S.
        Similar ongoing pregnancy rates after blastocyst transfer in fresh donor cycles and autologous cycles using cryopreserved bipronuclear oocytes suggest similar viability of transferred blastocysts.
        Fertil Steril. 2010; 93: 319-321
        • Shapiro B.S.
        • Daneshmand S.T.
        • Garner F.C.
        • Aguirre M.
        • Hudson C.
        • Thomas S.
        Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders.
        Fertil Steril. 2011; 96: 344-348
        • Griesinger G.
        • von Otte S.
        • Schroer A.
        • Ludwig A.K.
        • Diedrich K.
        • Al-Hasani S.
        • et al.
        Elective cryopreservation of all pronuclear oocytes after GnRH agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in patients at risk of developing OHSS: a prospective, observational proof-of-concept study.
        Hum Reprod. 2007; 22: 1348-1352
        • d'Angelo A.
        Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome prevention strategies: cryopreservation of all embryos.
        Semin Reprod Med. 2010; 28: 513-518
        • Griesinger G.
        • Schultz L.
        • Bauer T.
        • Broessner A.
        • Frambach T.
        • Kissler S.
        Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome prevention by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in combination with “freeze-all” strategy: a prospective multicentric study.
        Fertil Steril. 2011; 95: 2029-2033
        • Moher D.
        • Liberati A.
        • Tetzlaff J.
        • Altman D.G.
        Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
        BMJ. 2009; 339: 332-339
        • Higgins J.P.T.
        • Green S.
        Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0.
        Cochrane Collaboration, London2011
        • Higgins J.P.
        • Thompson S.G.
        • Deeks J.J.
        • Altman D.G.
        Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.
        BMJ. 2003; 327: 557-560
        • Aflatoonian A.
        • Moghaddam F.M.
        • Mashayekhy M.
        • Mohamadian F.
        Comparison of early pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after frozen and fresh embryo transfer in ART cycles.
        J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010; 27: 695-700
        • Wang Y.A.
        • Costello M.
        • Chapman M.
        • Black D.
        • Sullivan E.A.
        Transfers of fresh blastocysts and blastocysts cultured from thawed cleavage embryos are associated with fewer miscarriages.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2011; 23: 777-788
        • Zhou F.
        • Lin X.N.
        • Tong X.M.
        • Li C.
        • Liu L.
        • Jin X.Y.
        • et al.
        A frozen-thawed embryo transfer program improves the embryo utilization rate.
        Chin Med J (Engl). 2009; 122: 1974-1978
        • Check J.H.
        • Wilson C.
        • Choe J.K.
        • Amui J.
        • Katsoff B.
        A comparison of pregnancy rates following fresh and frozen embryo transfer according to the use of leuprolide acetate vs ganirelix vs cetrorelix.
        Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 37: 105-107
        • Aflatoonian A.
        • Oskouian H.
        • Ahmadi S.
        • Oskouian L.
        Can fresh embryo transfers be replaced by cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfers in assisted reproductive cycles? A randomized controlled trial.
        J Assist Reprod Genet. 2010; 27: 357-363
        • Shapiro B.S.
        • Daneshmand S.T.
        • Garner F.C.
        • Aguirre M.
        • Hudson C.
        • Thomas S.
        Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfers in high responders.
        Fertil Steril. 2011; 96: 516-518
        • Guyatt G.H.
        • Oxman A.D.
        • Vist G.E.
        • Kunz R.
        • Falck-Ytter Y.
        • et al.
        • GRADE Working Group
        GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.
        BMJ. 2008; 336: 924-926
        • Shapiro B.S.
        • Daneshmand S.T.
        • Garner F.C.
        • Aguirre M.
        • Hudson C.
        • Thomas S.
        Embryo cryopreservation rescues cycles with premature luteinization.
        Fertil Steril. 2010; 93: 636-641
        • Al-Azemi M.
        • Kyrou D.
        • Kolibianakis E.M.
        • Humaidan P.
        • van Vaerenbergh I.
        • Devroey P.
        • Fatemi H.M.
        Elevated progesterone during ovarian stimulation for IVF.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2012; 24: 381-388
        • Venetis C.A.
        • Kolibianakis E.M.
        • Papanikolaou E.
        • Bontis J.
        • Devroey P.
        • Tarlatzis B.C.
        Is progesterone elevation on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin administration associated with the probability of pregnancy in in vitro fertilization? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2007; 13: 343-355
        • Ubaldi F.
        • Bourgain C.
        • Tournaye H.
        • Smitz J.
        • van Steirteghem A.
        • Devroey P.
        Endometrial evaluation by aspiration biopsy on the day of oocyte retrieval in the embryo transfer cycles in patients with serum progesterone rise during the follicular phase.
        Fertil Steril. 1997; 67: 521-525
        • Filicori M.
        • Cognigni G.E.
        • Pocognoli P.
        • Tabarelli C.
        • Spettoli D.
        • Taraborrelli S.
        • et al.
        Modulation of folliculogenesis and steroidogenesis in women by graded menotrophin administration.
        Hum Reprod. 2002; 17: 2009-2015
        • Andersen A.N.
        • Devroey P.
        • Arce J.C.
        Clinical outcome following stimulation with highly purified hMG or recombinant FSH in patients undergoing IVF: a randomized assessor-blind controlled trial.
        Hum Reprod. 2006; 21: 3212-3227
        • Bosch E.
        • Escudero E.
        • Crespo J.
        • Cimón C.
        • Remohí J.
        • Pellicer A.
        Serum luteinizing hormone in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and its relationship with cycle outcome.
        Fertil Steril. 2005; 84: 1529-1532
        • Santos M.A.
        • Kuijk E.W.
        • Macklon N.S.
        The impact of ovarian stimulation for IVF on the developing embryo.
        Reproduction. 2010; 139: 23-34
        • Paulson R.J.
        • Sauer M.V.
        • Lobo R.A.
        Embryo implantation after human in vitro fertilization: importance of endometrial receptivity.
        Fertil Steril. 1990; 53: 870-874
        • Paulson R.J.
        Hormonal induction of endometrial receptivity.
        Fertil Steril. 2011; 96: 530-535
        • Simon C.
        • Cano F.
        • Valbuena D.
        • Remohí J.
        • Pellicer A.
        Clinical evidence for a detrimental effect on uterine receptivity of high serum estradiol levels in high and normal responders patients.
        Hum Reprod. 1995; 10: 2432-2437
        • Groothuis P.G.
        • Dassen H.H.
        • Romano A.
        • Punyadeera C.
        Estrogen and the endometrium: lessons learned fron gene expression profiling in rodents and human.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2007; 13: 405-417
        • Lass A.
        • Peat D.
        • Avery S.
        • Brinsden P.
        Histological evaluation of endometrium on the day of oocyte retrieval after gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist/follicle stimulating hormone ovulation induction for in-vitro fertilization.
        Hum Reprod. 1998; 13: 3203-3205
        • Fauser B.C.
        • Devroey P.
        Reproductive biology and IVF: ovarian stimulation and luteal phase consequences.
        Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2003; 14: 236-242
        • Haouzi D.
        • Assou S.
        • Mahmoud K.
        • Tondeur S.
        • Rème T.
        • Hedon B.
        • et al.
        Gene expression profile of human endometrial receptivity: comparison between natural and stimulated cycles for the same patients.
        Hum Reprod. 2009; 24: 1436-1445
        • Papanikolaou E.G.
        • Bourgain C.
        • Kolibianakis E.
        • Tournaye H.
        • Devroey P.
        Steroid receptor expression in late follicular phase endometrium in GnRH antagonist IVF cycles is already altered, indicating initiation of early luteal phase transformation in the absence of secretory changes.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2005; 20: 1541-1547
        • Labarta E.
        • Martínez-Conejero J.A.
        • Alamá P.
        • Horcajadas J.A.
        • Pellicer A.
        • Simón C.
        • et al.
        Endometrial receptivity is affected in women with high circulating progesterone levels at the end of the follicular phase: a functional genomics analysis.
        Hum Reprod. 2011; 26: 1813-1825
        • Strowitzki T.
        • Germeyer A.
        • Popovici R.
        • von Wolff M.
        The human endometrium as a fertility-determining factor.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2006; 12: 617-630
        • AbdelHafez F.F.
        • Desai N.
        • Abou-Setta A.M.
        • Falcone T.
        • Goldfarb J.
        Slow freezing, vitrification and ultra-rapid freezing of human embryos: a systematic review and metaanalysis.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2010; 20: 209-222
        • Guerif F.
        • Bidault R.
        • Cadoret V.
        • Couet M.L.
        • Lansac J.
        • Royere D.
        Parameters guiding selection of best embryo for transfer after cryopreservation: a reappraisal.
        Hum Reprod. 2002; 17: 1321-1326
        • Mandelbaum J.
        Embryo and oocyte cryopreservation.
        Hum Reprod. 2000; 15: 43-47
        • Martínez-Conejero J.A.
        • Simón C.
        • Pellicer A.
        • Horcajadas J.A.
        Is ovarian stimulation detrimental to the endometrium?.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2007; 15: 45-50
        • Horcajadas J.A.
        • Riesewijk A.
        • Polman J.
        • van Os R.
        • Pellicer A.
        • Mosselman S.
        • et al.
        Effect on controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF on endometrial gene expression profiles.
        Mol Hum Reprod. 2005; 11: 195-205
        • Glujovsky D.
        • Pesce R.
        • Fiszbajn G.
        • Sueldo C.
        • Hart R.J.
        • Ciapponi A.
        Endometrial preparation for women undergoing embryo transfer with frozen embryos or embryos derived from donor oocytes.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; 20: CD006359
        • Saragusty J.
        • Arav A.
        Current progress in oocyte and embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing and vitrification.
        Reproduction. 2011; 141: 1-19
        • Prades M.
        • Golmard J.L.
        • Schubert B.
        • Poirot C.
        Embryo cryopreservation: proposal for a new indicator of efficiency.
        Fertil Steril. 2011; 95: 577-582
        • Valojerdi M.
        • Eftekhari-Yazdi P.
        • Karimian L.
        • Hassani F.
        • Movaghar B.
        Vitrification versus slow freezing gives excellent survival, post warming embryo morphology and pregnancy outcomes for human cleaved embryos.
        J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009; 26: 347-354
        • Balaban B.
        • Urman B.
        • Ata B.
        • Isiklar A.
        • Larman M.G.
        • Hamilton R.
        • et al.
        A randomized controlled study of human day 3 embryo cryopreservation by slow freezing or vitrification: vitrification is associated with higher survival, metabolism and blastocyst formation.
        Hum Reprod. 2008; 23: 1976-1982
        • Smith G.D.
        • Serafini P.C.
        • Fioravanti J.
        • Yadid I.
        • Coslovsky M.
        • Hassun P.
        • et al.
        Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte cryopreservation with slow-rate freezing or vitrification.
        Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: 2088-2095
        • Loutradi K.E.
        • Kolibianakis E.M.
        • Venetis C.A.
        • Papanikolaou E.G.
        • Pados G.
        • Bontis I.
        • et al.
        Cryopreservation of human embryos by vitrification or slow freezing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Fertil Steril. 2008; 90: 186-193
        • Cao Y.X.
        • Xing Q.
        • Li L.
        • Cong L.
        • Zhang Z.G.
        • Wei Z.L.
        • et al.
        Comparison of survival and embryonic development in human cryopreserved by slow freezing and vitrification.
        Fertil Steril. 2009; 92: 1306-1311
        • Clarke J.F.
        • van Rumste M.M.E.
        • Farquhar C.M.
        • Johnson N.P.
        • Mol B.W.J.
        • Herbison P.
        Measuring outcomes in fertility trials: can we rely on clinical pregnancy rates?.
        Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: 1647-1651