Advertisement

What is the true prevalence of infertility?

      Accurate population-based estimates of the incidence and prevalence of subfecundity and infertility are of central importance to clinicians in reproductive medicine, public health personnel, and policymakers and are of great interest to the general public. In this context, the contribution by Thoma et al. represents a very important step forward (
      • Thoma M.E.
      • McLain A.C.
      • Louis J.F.
      • King R.B.
      • Trumble A.C.
      • Sundaram R.
      • Buck Louis G.M.
      The prevalence of infertility in the United States as estimated by the current duration approach and a traditional constructed approach.
      ).
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Thoma M.E.
        • McLain A.C.
        • Louis J.F.
        • King R.B.
        • Trumble A.C.
        • Sundaram R.
        • Buck Louis G.M.
        The prevalence of infertility in the United States as estimated by the current duration approach and a traditional constructed approach.
        Fertil Steril. 2013; 99: 1324-1331
        • Keiding N.
        • Kvist K.
        • Hartvig H.
        • Tvede M.
        • Juul S.
        Estimating time to pregnancy from current durations in a cross-sectional sample.
        Biostatistics. 2002; 3: 565-578
        • Slama R.
        • Ducot B.
        • Carstensen L.
        • Lorente C.
        • de La Rochebrochard E.
        • Leridon H.
        • et al.
        Feasibility of the current-duration approach to studying human fecundity.
        Epidemiology. 2006; 17: 440-449
        • Gurunath S.
        • Pandian Z.
        • Anderson R.A.
        • Bhattacharya S.
        Defining infertility—a systematic review of prevalence studies.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2011; 17: 575-588
        • Stanford J.B.
        • Dunson D.B.
        Effects of sexual intercourse patterns in time to pregnancy studies.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2007; 165: 1088-1095

      Linked Article