Advertisement

Informing offspring of their conception by gamete or embryo donation: a committee opinion

  • Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
      This document discusses the ethical implications regarding informing offspring of their conception using gamete or embryo donation. It replaces the 2004 ASRM Ethics Committee document of the same name (Fertil Steril 2004;81:527–31).
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Fertility and Sterility
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Crockin S.L.
        Where is anonymous reproduction taking us now?.
        DePaul J Health Care L. 2009; 12: 241-251
        • Greenfield D.A.
        The impact of disclosure on donor gamete participants: donors, intended parents and offspring.
        Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 20: 265-268
        • Mahlstedt P.P.
        • LaBounty K.
        • Kennedy W.T.
        The views of adult offspring of sperm donation: essential feedback for the development of ethical guidelines within the practice of assisted reproductive technology in the United States.
        Fertil Steril. 2010; 93: 2236-2246
        • Patrizio P.
        • Mastroianni A.C.
        • Mastroianni L.
        Disclosure to children conceived with donor gametes should be optional.
        Hum Reprod. 2001; 16: 2036-2038
        • McGee G.
        • Brakman S.-V.
        • Gurmankin A.D.
        Gamete donation and anonymity: disclosure to children conceived with donor gametes should not be optional.
        Hum Reprod. 2001; 16: 2033-2036
        • Frith L.
        Gamete donation and anonymity: the ethical and legal debate.
        Hum Reprod. 2001; 16: 818-824
        • McWhinnie A.M.
        Children from assisted reproductive technology: the psychological issues and ethical dilemmas.
        Early Child Devel Care. 2000; 163: 13-23
        • Hahn S.J.
        • Craft-Rosenberg M.
        The disclosure decisions of parents who conceive children using donor eggs.
        JOGNN. 2002; 31: 283-293
        • Snowden R.
        The family and artificial reproduction.
        in: Bromham D.R. Dalton M.E. Jackson J.C. Philosophical ethics in reproductive medicine. Manchester University Press, Manchester1990: 70-78
        • Rumball A.
        • Adair V.
        Telling the story: parents' scripts for donor offspring.
        Hum Reprod. 1999; 14: 1392-1399
        • New York State Task Force on Life and the Law
        Assisted reproductive technologies: analysis and recommendations for policy.
        Health Education Service, Albany, NY1998
        • Golombok S.
        • Brewaeys A.
        • Giavazzi M.T.
        • Guerra D.
        • MacCallum F.
        • Rust J.
        The European study of assisted reproduction families: the transition to adolescence.
        Hum Reprod. 2002; 17: 830-840
        • Turner A.J.
        • Coyle A.
        What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy.
        Hum Reprod. 2000; 15: 2041-2051
        • McWhinnie A.
        Gamete donation and anonymity: should offspring from donated gametes continue to be denied knowledge of their origins and antecedents?.
        Hum Reprod. 2001; 16: 807-817
        • Pruett K.D.
        Strange bedfellows? Reproductive technology and child development.
        Infant Ment Health J. 1992; 13: 312-318
        • Golombok S.
        New families, old values: considerations regarding the welfare of the child.
        Hum Reprod. 1999; 13: 2342-2347
        • Gottlieb C.
        • Lalos O.
        • Lindblad F.
        Disclosure of donor insemination to the child: the impact of Swedish legislation on couples' attitudes.
        Hum Reprod. 2000; 15: 2052-2056
        • Waldman E.
        Wells conference on adoption law: what do we tell the children?.
        Cap U L Rev. 2006; 35: 517-561
      1. Elster NR. All or nothing? The international debate over disclosure to donor offspring. Available at: http://www.thehumanfuture.com. Last accessed February 21, 2013.

        • Foohey P.
        Recent developments in health law: potential national voluntary gamete donor registry discussed at recent health law symposium.
        J L Med & Ethics. 2008; 36: 597-600
        • Daniels K.R.
        • Lewis G.M.
        • Gillett W.
        Telling donor insemination offspring about their conception: the nature of couples' decision-making.
        Soc Sci Med. 1995; 40: 1213-1220
        • Amuzu B.
        • Laxova R.
        • Shapiro S.S.
        Pregnancy outcome, health of children, and family adjustment after donor insemination.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 75: 899-905
        • Golombok S.
        • Murray C.
        • Brinsden P.
        • Abdalla H.
        Social versus biological parenting: family functioning and the socioemotional development of children conceived by egg or sperm donation.
        J Child Psychol Psychiat. 1999; 40: 519-527
        • Applegarth L.
        • Goldberg N.C.
        • Cholst I.
        • McGoff N.
        • Fantini D.
        • Zellers N.
        • et al.
        Families created through ovum donation: a preliminary investigation of obstetrical outcome and psychosocial adjustment.
        J Assist Reprod Gen. 1995; 12: 574-580
        • Mahlstedt P.P.
        • Greenfeld D.A.
        Assisted reproductive technology with donor gametes: the need for patient preparation.
        Fertil Steril. 1989; 52: 908-914
        • Pacey A.
        Sperm donor recruitment in the UK.
        Obs & Gynae. 2010; 12: 43-48
        • Greenfeld D.A.
        • Klock S.C.
        • Rausch D.T.
        Disclosure patterns in couples who have conceived via oocyte donation.
        Fertil Steril. 2002; 78: S27
        • Klock S.C.
        • Maier D.
        Psychological factors related to donor insemination.
        Fertil Steril. 1991; 56: 489-495
        • Klock S.C.
        • Jacob M.C.
        • Maier D.
        A prospective study of donor insemination recipients: secrecy, privacy, and disclosure.
        Fertil Steril. 1994; 62: 477-484
        • Cook R.
        • Golombok S.
        • Bish A.
        • Murray C.
        Disclosure of donor insemination: parental attitudes.
        Am J Orthopsych. 1995; 65: 549-559
        • Nachtigall R.D.
        • Becker G.
        • Quiroga S.S.
        • Tschann J.M.
        The disclosure decision: concerns and issues of parents of children conceived through donor insemination.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 178: 1165-1170
        • Nachtigall R.D.
        • Tschann J.M.
        • Quiroga S.S.
        • Pitcher L.
        • Becker L.
        Stigma, disclosure, and family functioning among parents of children conceived through donor insemination.
        Fertil Steril. 1997; 68: 83-89
        • Sewall G.
        • Mason L.
        Parental acceptance, disclosure and decision making amongst recipients in an anonymous donor ooctye program.
        Fertil Steril. 1995; 64: S252-S253
        • Isaksson S.
        • Sydsjö G.
        • Skoog Svanberg A.
        • Lampic C.
        Disclosure behaviour and intentions among 111 couples following treatment with oocytes or sperm from identity-release donors: follow-up at offspring age 1-4 years.
        Hum Reprod. 2012; 27: 2998-3007
        • Shehab D.
        • Duff J.
        • Pasch L.A.
        • et al.
        How parents whose children have been conceived with donor gametes make their disclosure decision: contexts, influences, and couple dynamics.
        Fertil Steril. 2007; 89: 179-187
        • Scheib J.E.
        • Riordan M.
        • Shaver P.R.
        Choosing between anonymous and identity-release sperm donors: recipient and donor characteristics.
        Reprod Technol. 2000; 10: 50-58
      2. The Sperm Bank of California. Available at: http://www.thespermbankofca.org. Last accessed February 21, 2013.

        • Elster N.R.
        • Braverman A.
        The future is now: a voluntary gamete donor registry is feasible.
        DePaul J of Health Care L. 2009; 12: 195-201
        • Benward J.
        • Braverman A.
        • Galen B.
        Maximizing autonomy and the changing view of donor conception: the creation of a national donor registry.
        DePaul J Health Care L. 2009; 12: 225-240
        • Lalos A.
        • Daniels K.
        • Gottlieb C.
        • Lalos O.
        Recruitment and motivation of semen providers in Sweden.
        Hum Reprod. 2003; 18: 212-216
        • Daniels K.R.
        • Lewis G.M.
        • Curson R.
        Information sharing in semen donation: the views of donors.
        Soc Sci Med. 1997; 44: 673-680
        • Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
        Recommendations for gamete and embryo donation: a committee opinion.
        Fertil Steril. 2013; 99: 47-62
        • The Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
        Revised minimum guidelines for practices offering assisted reproductive technologies.
        Fertil. Steril. 2008; 90: S165-S168
      3. Current Opinions of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association. E-2.05 Artificial insemination by anonymous donor. Available at: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion205.shtml. Last accessed February 21, 2013.

      4. American Association of Tissue Banks. Standards of tissue banking. 12th ed. 2011. Available at http://www.aatb.org, visited February 2013.

        • Garrison M.
        Law making for baby making: an interpretive approach to the determination of legal parentage.
        Harv L Rev. 2000; 113: 835-923
        • Chestney E.S.
        The right to know one's genetic origin: can, should, or must a state that extends this right to adoptees extend an analogous right to children conceived with donor gametes?.
        Texas L Rev. 2001; 80: 365-391
        • American Society for Reproductive Medicine
        1993 Guidelines for gamete donation.
        Fertil Steril. 1993; 59: S1-S9
        • American Society for Reproductive Medicine
        1998 Guidelines for gamete and embryo donation.
        Fertil Steril. 1998; 70: S1-S6
        • Lifton B.J.
        Journey of the adopted self: a quest for wholeness.
        Basic Books, New York1994
        • Brodzinsky D.M.
        • Smith D.W.
        • Brodzinsky A.B.
        Children's adjustment to adoption: developmental and clinical issues.
        Sage Publications, London1998
        • Howe D.
        • Feast J.
        Adoption, search and reunion: the long-term experience of adopted adults.
        The Children's Society, London2000
        • Samuels E.J.
        The idea of adoption: an inquiry into the history of adult adoptee access to birth records.
        Rutgers L Rev. 2001; 53: 367-436
      5. Oregon Revised Statutes §432.240 (2009). Available at: http://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/432.240. Last accessed February 28, 2013.

      6. Tennessee Code Annotated §36-1-127 (2011). Available at: http://www.state.tn.us/tccy/tnchild/36/36-1-127.htm. Last accessed February 28, 2013.

        • Andrews L.B.
        • Elster N.
        Adoption, reproduction technologies, and genetic information.
        Health Matrix. 1998; 8: 125-151
      7. National Adoption Information Clearinghouse. Available at: http://www.adoption.org/adopt/national-adoption-information-clearinghouse.php. Last accessed February 21, 2013.