Advertisement

Carbon dioxide versus normal saline as distension medium for diagnostic hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

      Objective

      To appraise critically the published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing carbon dioxide (CO2) with normal saline (NS) as distension medium for diagnostic hysteroscopy.

      Design

      Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

      Setting

      Outpatient and inpatient hysteroscopy clinics.

      Patient(s)

      Women undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy.

      refvention(s)

      CO2 or NS as distension medium for diagnostic hysteroscopy.

      Main Outcome Measure(s)

      Procedural and shoulder pain, side effects, satisfaction, quality of view, duration of procedure.

      Result(s)

      Ten RCTs involving 1,839 women (905 in the CO2 group, 934 in the NS group) were systematically analyzed. There was significant heterogeneity among the included trials. Compared with NS, CO2 was associated with greater procedural pain, more occurrences of shoulder pain and side effects, less satisfaction, less quality of view, and greater duration of procedure.

      Conclusion(s)

      A meta-analysis from the available moderate quality trials suggests that NS might be superior to CO2 for use in diagnostic hysteroscopy. Owing to problems of clinical diversity, statistical heterogeneity, and risk of bias, it is clear that additional pragmatic multicenter RCTs are needed to corroborate these findings before firm evidence-based guidelines can be given.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
        ACOG technology assessment in obstetrics and gynecology, no. 4, August 2005: hysteroscopy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 106: 439-442
      1. Department of Health. Hospital outpatient activity—April 2011–March 2012. Available at: http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB09379/hosp-outp-acti-11-12-main-proc-inte-tab.xls. Accessed May 18, 2013.

      2. Department of Health. Hospital episode statistics, admitted patient care—England, 2011–12. Available at: http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB08288/hosp-epis-stat-admi-tot-ops-11-12-tab.xls. Accessed May 18, 2013.

        • Campo R.
        • van Belle Y.
        • Rombauts L.
        • Brosens I.
        • Gordts S.
        Office mini-hysteroscopy.
        Hum Reprod Update. 1999; 5: 73-81
        • Menken F.C.
        [A new technic of endocervicoscopy, German].
        Arch Gynakol. 1967; 204: 168-169
        • Cornier E.
        [Ambulatory hysterofibroscopic treatment of persistent metrorrhagias using the Nd:YAG laser, French].
        J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1986; 15: 661-664
        • Lin B.L.
        • Miyamoto N.
        • Tomomatsu M.
        • Horikoshi H.
        • Nakamura H.
        • Iwata Y.
        [The development of a new flexible hysterofiberscope and its clinical application, Japanese].
        Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1987; 39: 649-654
        • Karabacak O.
        • Tiras M.B.
        • Taner M.Z.
        • Guner H.
        • Yildiz A.
        • Yildirim M.
        Small diameter versus conventional laparoscopy: a prospective, self-controlled study.
        Hum Reprod. 1997; 12: 2399-2401
        • Perez-Medina T.
        • Bajo J.M.
        • Martinez-Cortes L.
        • Castellanos P.
        • Perez de Avila I.
        Six thousand office diagnostic-operative hysteroscopies.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000; 71: 33-38
        • di Spiezio Sardo A.
        • Taylor A.
        • Tsirkas P.
        • Mastrogamvrakis G.
        • Sharma M.
        • Magos A.
        Hysteroscopy: a technique for all? Analysis of 5,000 outpatient hysteroscopies.
        Fertil Steril. 2008; 89: 438-443
        • Soderstrom R.M.
        Distending the uterus: what medium is best?.
        Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 35: 225-228
        • Quiñones R.G.
        Hysteroscopy: choosing distending media.
        Int J Fertil. 1984; 29: 129-132
      3. Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: http://handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed May 18, 2013.

        • The Cochrane Collaboration
        Review Manager (Revman) [computer program]. Version 5.2.
        The Nordic Cochrane Center, Copenhagen2012
        • DerSimonian R.
        • Laird N.
        Meta-analysis in clinical trials.
        Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7: 177-188
        • DeMets D.L.
        Methods for combining randomized clinical trials: strengths and limitations.
        Stat Med. 1987; 6: 341-350
        • Higgins J.P.
        • Thompson S.G.
        Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.
        Stat Med. 2002; 21: 1539-1558
        • Egger M.
        • Smith G.D.
        • Altman D.G.
        Altman DG. Systematic reviews in healthcare.
        BMJ Publishing, London2008
        • Deeks JJ
        • Altman DG
        • Bradburn MJ
        Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in meta-analysis.
        in: Systemic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. 2nd ed. BMJ Publication, London2001
        • Brozek J.
        • Oxman A.
        • Schünemann H.
        Gradepro [computer program]. Version 3.2 for Windows.
        2008
        • Almeida Z.M.
        • Pontes R.
        Costa Hde L. [Evaluation of pain in diagnostic hysteroscopy by vaginoscopy using normal saline at body temperature as distension medium: a randomized controlled trial, Portuguese].
        Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2008; 30: 25-30
        • Brusco G.F.
        • Arena S.
        • Angelini A.
        Use of carbon dioxide versus normal saline for diagnostic hysteroscopy.
        Fertil Steril. 2003; 79: 993-997
        • Diniz D.B.
        • Depes DdB
        • Pereira A.M.
        • David S.D.
        • Lippi U.G.
        • Baracat F.F.
        • et al.
        [Pain evaluation in office hysteroscopy: comparison of two techniques, Portuguese].
        Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2010; 32: 26-32
        • Litta P.
        • Bonora M.
        • Pozzan C.
        • Merlin F.
        • Sacco G.
        • Fracas M.
        • et al.
        Carbon dioxide versus normal saline in outpatient hysteroscopy.
        Hum Reprod. 2003; 18: 2446-2449
        • Nagele F.
        • Bournas N.
        • O'Connor H.
        • Broadbent M.
        • Richardson R.
        • Magos A.
        Comparison of carbon dioxide and normal saline for uterine distension in outpatient hysteroscopy.
        Fertil Steril. 1996; 65: 305-309
        • Paschopoulos M.
        • Kaponis A.
        • Makrydimas G.
        • Zikopoulos K.
        • Alamanos Y.
        • O'Donovan P.
        • et al.
        Selecting distending medium for out-patient hysteroscopy. Does it really matter?.
        Hum Reprod. 2004; 19: 2619-2625
        • Pellicano M.
        • Guida M.
        • Zullo F.
        • Lavitola G.
        • Cirillo D.
        • Nappi C.
        Carbon dioxide versus normal saline as a uterine distension medium for diagnostic vaginoscopic hysteroscopy in infertile patients: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.
        Fertil Steril. 2003; 79: 418-421
        • Pluchino N.
        • Ninni F.
        • Angioni S.
        • Artini P.
        • Araujo V.G.
        • Massimetti G.
        • et al.
        Office vaginoscopic hysteroscopy in infertile women: effects of gynecologist experience, instrument size, and distention medium on patient discomfort.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010; 17: 344-350
        • Raimondo G.
        • Raimondo D.
        • d’Aniello G.
        • Russo C.
        • Ronga A.
        • Gabbanini M.
        • et al.
        A randomized controlled study comparing carbon dioxide versus normal saline as distension media in diagnostic office hysteroscopy: is the distension with carbon dioxide a problem?.
        Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: 2319-2322
        • Shankar M.
        • Davidson A.
        • Taub N.
        • Habiba M.
        Randomised comparison of distension media for outpatient hysteroscopy.
        BJOG. 2004; 111: 57-62
        • Lavitola G.
        • Guida M.
        • Pellicano M.
        • Acunzo G.
        • Cirillo D.
        • Nappi C.
        [Options for uterine distension during hysteroscopy, Italian].
        Minerva Ginecol. 2002; 54: 461-465
        • Shankar M.
        • Davidson A.
        • Taub N.
        • Habiba M.
        • Pellicano M.
        Saline as distension medium for diagnostic hysteroscopy resulted in better visualization than carbon dioxide.
        Evid Based Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 6: 186-187
        • Cooper N.A.
        • Smith P.
        • Khan K.S.
        • Clark T.J.
        A systematic review of the effect of the distension medium on pain during outpatient hysteroscopy.
        Fertil Steril. 2011; 95: 264-271