Advertisement

Interferometric phase microscopy for label-free morphological evaluation of sperm cells

      Objective

      To compare label-free interferometric phase microscopy (IPM) to label-free and label-based bright-field microscopy (BFM) in evaluating sperm cell morphology. This comparison helps in evaluating the potential of IPM for clinical sperm analysis without staining.

      Design

      Comparison of imaging modalities.

      Setting

      University laboratory.

      Patient(s)

      Sperm samples were obtained from healthy sperm donors.

      Intervention(s)

      We evaluated 350 sperm cells, using portable IPM and BFM, according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. The parameters evaluated were length and width of the sperm head and midpiece; size and width of the acrosome; head, midpiece, and tail configuration; and general normality of the cell.

      Main Outcome Measure(s)

      Continuous variables were compared using the Student's t test. Categorical variables were compared with the χ2 test of independence. Sensitivity and specificity of IPM and label-free BFM were calculated and compared with label-based BFM.

      Result(s)

      No statistical differences were found between IPM and label-based BFM in the WHO criteria. In contrast, IPM measurements of head and midpiece width and acrosome area were different from those of label-free BFM. Sensitivity and specificity of IPM were higher than those of label-free BFM for the WHO criteria.

      Conclusion(s)

      Label-free IPM can identify sperm cell abnormalities, with an excellent correlation with label-based BFM, and with higher accuracy compared with label-free BFM. Further prospective clinical trials are required to enable IPM as part of clinical sperm selection procedures.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      References

        • Steptoe P.C.
        • Edwards R.G.
        Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo.
        Lancet. 1978; 2: 366
        • Kruger T.F.
        • Acosta A.A.
        • Simmons K.F.
        • Swanson R.J.
        • Matta J.F.
        • Oehninger S.
        Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization.
        Fertil Steril. 1988; 49: 112-117
        • Bartoov B.
        • Eltes F.
        • Pansky M.
        • Lederman H.
        • Caspi E.
        • Soffer Y.
        Estimating fertility potential via semen analysis data.
        Hum Reprod. 1993; 8: 65-70
        • Berkovitz A.
        • Eltes F.
        • Soffer Y.
        • Zabludovsky N.
        • Beyth Y.
        • Farhi J.
        • et al.
        ART success and in vivo sperm cell selection depend on the ultramorphological status of spermatozoa.
        Andrologia. 1999; 31: 1-8
      1. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human sperm. Available at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/infertility/9789241547789/en. Last accessed May 10, 2015.

        • Ainsworth C.
        • Nixon B.
        • Aitken R.
        Development of a novel electrophoretic system for the isolation of human spermatozoa.
        Hum Reprod. 2005; 20: 2261-2270
        • Zernike F.
        How I discovered phase contrast.
        Science. 1955; 121: 345-349
        • Bartoov B.
        • Berkovitz A.
        • Eltes F.
        • Kogosowski A.
        • Menezo Y.
        • Barak Y.
        Real-time fine morphology of motile human sperm cells is associated with IVF-ICSI outcome.
        J Androl. 2002; 23: 1-8
        • Girshovitz P.
        • Shaked N.T.
        Generalized cell morphological parameters based on interferometric phase microscopy and their application to cell life cycle characterization.
        Biomed Opt Express. 2012; 3: 1757-1773
        • Coppola G.
        • Di Caprio G.
        • Wilding M.
        • Ferraro P.
        • Esposito G.
        • Di Matteo L.
        • et al.
        Digital holographic microscopy for the evaluation of human sperm structure.
        Zygote. 2014; 22: 446-454
        • Di Caprio G.
        • El Mallahi A.
        • Ferraro P.
        • Dale R.
        • Coppola G.
        • Dale B.
        • et al.
        4D tracking of clinical seminal samples for quantitative characterization of motility parameters.
        Biomed Opt Express. 2014; 5: 690-700
        • Shaked N.T.
        Quantitative phase microscopy of biological samples using a portable interferometer.
        Opt Lett. 2012; 37: 2016-2018
        • Girshovitz P.
        • Shaked N.T.
        Compact and portable low-coherence interferometer with off-axis geometry for quantitative phase microscopy and nanoscopy.
        Opt Express. 2013; 21: 5701-5714
        • Teixeira D.M.
        • Barbosa M.A.
        • Ferriani R.A.
        • Navarro P.A.
        • Raine-Fenning N.
        • Nastri C.O.
        • et al.
        Regular (ICSI) versus ultra-high magnification (IMSI) sperm selection for assisted reproduction.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; : CD010167
        • Palermo G.
        • Joris H.
        • Devroey P.
        • Van Steirteghem A.C.
        Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte.
        Lancet. 1992; 340: 17-18
        • Jungheim E.S.
        • Ryan G.L.
        • Levens E.D.
        • Cunningham A.F.
        • Macones G.A.
        • Carson K.R.
        • et al.
        Embryo transfer practices in the United States: a survey of clinics registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.
        Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: 1432-1436
        • McDowell S.
        • Kroon B.
        • Ford E.
        • Hook Y.
        • Glujovsky D.
        • Yazdani A.
        Advanced sperm selection techniques for assisted reproduction.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; : CD010461
        • Murphy D.
        Differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy and modulation contrast microscopy.
        in: Fundamentals of light microscopy and digital imaging. Wiley-Liss, New York2001: 153-168
        • Marquet P.
        • Rappaz B.
        • Magistretti P.J.
        • Cuche E.
        • Emery Y.
        • Colomb T.
        • et al.
        Digital holographic microscopy: a noninvasive contrast imaging technique allowing quantitative visualization of living cells with subwavelength axial accuracy.
        Opt Lett. 2005; 30: 468-470
        • Crha I.
        • Zakova J.
        • Huser M.
        • Ventruba P.
        • Lousova E.
        • Pohanka M.
        Digital holographic microscopy in human sperm imaging.
        J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011; 28: 725-729
        • Girshovitz P.
        • Shaked N.T.
        Doubling the field of view in off-axis low-coherence interferometric imaging.
        Light: Sci Appl. 2014; 3: 1-9

      References

        • Saleh B.A.E.
        • Teich M.C.
        Statistical optics.
        in: Saleh B.A.E. Fundamentals of photonics. Wiley, Chichester1991: 403-442
        • Girshovitz P.
        • Shaked N.T.
        Real-time quantitative phase reconstruction in off-axis digital holography using multiplexing.
        Opt Lett. 2014; 39: 2262-2265
        • Ghiglia D.C.
        • Pritt M.D.
        Two-dimensional phase unwrapping: theory, algorithms, and software.
        Wiley, Chichester1998